
Technical article
Fire and explosion risk in shot blasting
Process fundamentals
The fine dust generated during shot blasting and other machining processes can, under certain conditions, ignite or even explode. Far from being a hazard limited to highly specific plants, it is present across much of everyday industrial activity.
In blasting equipment, accidents usually originate in operating and preventive-maintenance oversights. A “routine” incident can carry high economic costs and put operators at risk. This article explains when a fire or explosion hazard exists, how its severity is measured and what measures prevent it.
How a dust explosion occurs
For a dust explosion to occur, five conditions must be present simultaneously. This is represented as the “dust explosion pentagon”: removing any single element prevents the explosion (though not necessarily a fire).
• Combustible dust, in particles fine enough to propagate the flame.
• Dispersion: the dust must be suspended in air as a cloud.
• Concentration within the material's explosive range.
• Ignition source with enough energy (spark, flame, hot surface, static discharge).
• Confinement in an enclosed space (equipment, ducts, building) and the presence of oxygen.
What sets it apart from a fire is speed: in a dust cloud, combustion spreads from particle to particle very fast, producing a pressure wave.
Fine particles: why size matters
Not all dust is equally dangerous. The risk rises sharply with the finest fractions.
• Particles larger than 500 µm generally present a low combustion risk.
• Processes usually produce a mix of coarse and fine material (below 420 µm): the fines ignite easily and, in turn, ignite the coarser particles.
• Changes in the process —speed, alloy, lubricant or abrasive— can produce finer particles and raise the risk, so they call for a fresh explosivity assessment.
• Accumulated fine dust can cause secondary explosions: an initial deflagration lifts the dust deposited around the area and, when it ignites, produces follow-on explosions that are often more destructive than the first.
Kst index: how severe an explosion would be
The Kst index quantifies the potential violence of a dust explosion in an enclosed space. It is expressed in bar·m/s and represents the maximum rate of pressure rise during a deflagration: the higher the Kst, the faster the pressure rises and the greater the potential structural damage.
It is determined by a standardised test (ASTM E1226) in a 20-litre sphere, measuring the maximum pressure and the maximum rate of pressure rise, as Kst = (dP/dt)max · V^(1/3).
It is key to understand what it measures: the Kst indicates the severity of the explosion, not whether the dust can ignite.
| Classification | Kst range (bar·m/s) | Risk level |
|---|---|---|
| ST 0 | 0 | Non-explosive |
| ST 1 | 1–200 | Low explosivity |
| ST 2 | 201–300 | Medium explosivity |
| ST 3 | > 300 | High explosivity |
Explosivity of common abrasives and dusts
The table below compares the behaviour of common abrasives and other dusts. It helps anticipate the risk level based on the material being processed.
| Origin | Material / Abrasive | Kst (bar·m/s) | Class | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metálico | Aluminium | 400–600 | ST 3 | Highly explosive; critical risk as fine dust |
| Metallic | Iron and carbon steel | 80–200 | ST 1 | Can act as an oxidiser with Al (thermite risk) |
| Metallic | Stainless steel (fine dust) | 1–50 | ST 1 | Combustible as fine suspension; safe against thermite |
| Glass | Glass bead | 0 | ST 0 | Inert; respiratory risk if fractured |
| Metallic mineral | Copper slag | 0 | ST 0 | Generally inert; check for metallic traces |
| Mineral | Aluminium oxide (Al₂O₃) | 0 | ST 0 | Inert to explosion; main risk is inhalation |
| Mineral | Garnet | 0 | ST 0 | Inert; safe alternative to silica sand |
| Mineral | Silica sand | 0 | ST 0 | Non-explosive, but high silicosis risk |
| Organic | Flour, sugar, grain, wood | 60–300 | ST 1–ST 2 | Explosive as fine suspension (food industry) |
Reference values; they depend on each dust's composition, particle size and moisture. Real samples should be tested to ASTM E1226 for any installation. Even everyday dusts (flour, sugar, wood) can be explosive in suspension.
Ignition sources and how to reduce them
Controlling ignition sources is one of the two variables that can be worked on daily (the other is dust concentration). They are grouped by origin.
| Origin | Source | How to reduce it |
|---|---|---|
| Electrical | Static charge | Use antistatic filter cartridges and ensure system earthing |
| Electrical | Electric shock / arc | Earth all equipment: collector, ducts, drums and metal structures |
| Thermal | Hot surfaces, welding, grinding, cigarettes | Ban hot work near the equipment without a permit (safe-work procedure); first remove all dust |
| Chemical | Decomposition, polymerisation, self-heating | Control dust storage, avoid prolonged accumulation and verify material compatibility |
| Mechanical | Friction, impact or fracture of hard materials | Do not strike the hopper or collector interior with metal tools; use anti-spark tools |
Prevention and safe dust collection
Prevention rests on reducing the available dust and removing ignition sources.
• Minimise the generation and dispersion of combustible dust and prevent it from accumulating on floors, ducts, hoppers and structures (focus on secondary explosions).
• Keep dust-collection systems running: they capture potentially explosive fine particles at source.
• Earth equipment, collectors and drums to dissipate static.
• Clean without raising dust clouds: by vacuum or direct collection, never with compressed air; use natural-fibre brushes and anti-spark tools.
• Discharge dust into earthed metal containers and empty them daily.
• Apply lockout/tagout (LOTO) before opening or servicing the equipment, and obtain a hot-work permit before welding or cutting.
The choice between dry and wet collector depends on the dust's explosivity, the location and costs; combustible metallic dusts usually point the decision toward a wet collector.
Technical conclusion
In typical shot blasting processes, with coarse mineral or metallic abrasives, the explosion risk is low. However, fine dust from wear, removed paint or contaminants can change the explosive behaviour, and a change of abrasive or the addition of lubricants can alter the effective Kst of the accumulated dust.
It is therefore advisable to avoid the build-up of fine dust, keep the extraction system always operational and test real samples whenever there is doubt about the dust composition.
Special Projects
Can't find the equipment you need?

CYM Materiales develops it.
Our Engineering and Sales team works alongside the client to design a custom solution, reducing operating costs and maximizing productivity. Every project starts with a detailed technical assessment and ends with a machine built and tested at our plant
REQUEST A CUSTOM PROJECT